Floatton ‑ Floating Buttons and RT: Google Fonts, Custom Fonts both address Shopify merchants' needs for enhancing their store's design, but they cater to drastically different aspects. Floatton, implied by its name, likely provides a way to add floating action buttons, which focus on improving user engagement and call-to-action visibility. In contrast, RT: Google Fonts, Custom Fonts specializes in typography, offering merchants the ability to personalize their store's appearance by leveraging Google Fonts or uploading custom fonts. This app directly addresses the desire for brand uniqueness and visual appeal. The key difference lies in their functionalities and target audience. Floatton likely appeals to merchants looking to improve conversion rates and user experience through strategically placed interactive elements. RT: Google Fonts, Custom Fonts, on the other hand, targets merchants focused on branding, visual identity, and creating a unique aesthetic that aligns with their brand. RT offers a solution for merchants seeking aesthetic customizations, whereas Floatton likely aims to drive customer engagement. It should also be noted that while Floatton holds a perfect 5/5 rating, the rating is based on a very small sample size (10 reviews). RT: Google Fonts, Custom Fonts, with its 4.4/5 rating from 75 reviews, has a more established user base and a more statistically significant rating.
10 reviews
75 reviews
Easy way to add Google Fonts to your theme without coding. Merchants can also upload custom fonts.
| Rating | 5/5 | 4.4/5 |
Rating Floatton ‑ Floating Buttons5/5 RT: Google Fonts, Custom Fonts4.4/5 | ||
| Reviews | 10 | 75 |
Reviews Floatton ‑ Floating Buttons10 RT: Google Fonts, Custom Fonts75 | ||
| Primary Function | Floating Buttons (Inferred) | Font Customization (Google & Custom Fonts) |
Primary Function Floatton ‑ Floating ButtonsFloating Buttons (Inferred) RT: Google Fonts, Custom FontsFont Customization (Google & Custom Fonts) | ||
| Target Merchant | Merchants focused on UX and conversions | Merchants focused on branding and visual identity |
Target Merchant Floatton ‑ Floating ButtonsMerchants focused on UX and conversions RT: Google Fonts, Custom FontsMerchants focused on branding and visual identity | ||
| Ease of Use (Inferred) | Likely simple setup | Potentially technical for custom font uploads |
Ease of Use (Inferred) Floatton ‑ Floating ButtonsLikely simple setup RT: Google Fonts, Custom FontsPotentially technical for custom font uploads | ||
| Value Proposition | Improved user engagement and call-to-action visibility | Unique brand aesthetic and improved visual appeal |
Value Proposition Floatton ‑ Floating ButtonsImproved user engagement and call-to-action visibility RT: Google Fonts, Custom FontsUnique brand aesthetic and improved visual appeal | ||
| Coding Required | Likely no coding required | No coding required (as per description) |
Coding Required Floatton ‑ Floating ButtonsLikely no coding required RT: Google Fonts, Custom FontsNo coding required (as per description) | ||
| Customization focus | Functional - User Interaction | Aesthetic - Font Choice |
Customization focus Floatton ‑ Floating ButtonsFunctional - User Interaction RT: Google Fonts, Custom FontsAesthetic - Font Choice | ||
Choosing between Floatton ‑ Floating Buttons and RT: Google Fonts, Custom Fonts depends entirely on the merchant's specific needs. If the primary goal is to improve user engagement and highlight key actions on the website, then Floatton is likely the better choice, assuming it delivers on its implied functionality. However, given the limited number of reviews, proceeding with caution and further investigation is advisable.
On the other hand, if the merchant is heavily invested in branding and visual identity and wants to customize their store's fonts to create a unique and memorable experience, RT: Google Fonts, Custom Fonts is the more suitable option. The higher number of reviews suggests a more stable and reliable app, despite the slightly lower rating. For a merchant focused on maximizing visual branding, RT: Google Fonts, Custom Fonts is the clear winner.
Both apps claim to be user-friendly and require no coding. However, RT: Google Fonts, Custom Fonts may have a steeper learning curve if you plan to upload custom fonts, as file management and compatibility can sometimes be tricky.
Based solely on the review count, RT: Google Fonts, Custom Fonts likely has a larger user base, which could suggest better long-term support due to increased feedback and developer attention. However, this is just speculation.
Yes, as they address different areas of website customization. One focuses on user engagement, while the other focuses on aesthetics. There should be no conflicts in using them together.
The description for the apps doesn't mention any impact on website speed. Floatton, by adding dynamic elements, *could* potentially slow down a site if poorly implemented. RT: Google Fonts, Custom Fonts, *could* slow down a site if the fonts it uses are too large. Merchants should test with both apps enabled to check for any issues.
Floatton is *potentially* more likely to directly improve conversion rates by highlighting key actions. However, this depends on effective implementation. RT: Google Fonts, Custom Fonts can *indirectly* impact conversion rates by improving the overall user experience and building brand trust through a visually appealing website.
Run audits for SEO, CRO, PageSpeed, and AI visibility. Get a clear report and actionable fixes.
Try Fix My Store