MIT Payment Hider and Redeemly Store Credit Cashback, while both listed in the 'Payment options - Other' category on Shopify, address very different needs. MIT Payment Hider focuses on customizing the checkout experience by allowing merchants to hide, sort, or rename payment methods based on various conditions. Its target audience appears to be merchants who need granular control over which payment options are presented to specific customers or under specific circumstances. Redeemly Store Credit Cashback, on the other hand, focuses on incentivizing repeat purchases and building customer loyalty through a store credit cashback program. Its target audience is merchants looking to increase customer lifetime value and reward loyal shoppers. The primary difference lies in their functionality: MIT Payment Hider manages payment option visibility while Redeemly rewards purchases with store credit. The most glaring difference between the two apps is their reputation. Redeemly boasts a perfect 5/5 rating based on 45 reviews, suggesting a well-received and reliable app. MIT Payment Hider, in stark contrast, has a 0/5 rating with no reviews, indicating that it is either a brand new app with no user feedback yet or, potentially, an app with significant issues preventing users from adopting or recommending it. This difference in user validation should be a primary consideration for merchants choosing between the two. The debug option in MIT Payment Hider suggests it may be early in development and could experience bugs.
0 reviews
45 reviews
Hide, sort, or rename payment methods based on specific conditions to simplify your checkout
| Rating | 0/5 | 5/5 |
Rating MIT Payment Hider0/5 Redeemly Store Credit Cashback5/5 | ||
| Reviews | 0 | 45 |
Reviews MIT Payment Hider0 Redeemly Store Credit Cashback45 | ||
| Core Functionality | Payment Method Visibility Control | Store Credit Cashback Program |
Core Functionality MIT Payment HiderPayment Method Visibility Control Redeemly Store Credit CashbackStore Credit Cashback Program | ||
| Target Merchant | Merchants needing advanced payment method customization (e.g., B2B, international) | Merchants focused on customer loyalty and repeat purchases |
Target Merchant MIT Payment HiderMerchants needing advanced payment method customization (e.g., B2B, international) Redeemly Store Credit CashbackMerchants focused on customer loyalty and repeat purchases | ||
| Key Feature | Conditional Payment Method Hiding (country, customer, cart value) | Store credit cashback on purchases |
Key Feature MIT Payment HiderConditional Payment Method Hiding (country, customer, cart value) Redeemly Store Credit CashbackStore credit cashback on purchases | ||
| Value Proposition | Improved checkout experience through tailored payment options | Increased customer loyalty and sales through rewards |
Value Proposition MIT Payment HiderImproved checkout experience through tailored payment options Redeemly Store Credit CashbackIncreased customer loyalty and sales through rewards | ||
| Ease of Use (estimated) | Potentially complex due to customization options | Likely straightforward cashback setup |
Ease of Use (estimated) MIT Payment HiderPotentially complex due to customization options Redeemly Store Credit CashbackLikely straightforward cashback setup | ||
| Risk (based on reviews) | High (no reviews, potential bugs) | Low (positive reviews) |
Risk (based on reviews) MIT Payment HiderHigh (no reviews, potential bugs) Redeemly Store Credit CashbackLow (positive reviews) | ||
Given the available data, Redeemly Store Credit Cashback appears to be the safer and more reliable choice for most merchants in 2026. Its positive reviews and straightforward value proposition make it a compelling option for businesses looking to boost customer loyalty. MIT Payment Hider, while offering potentially powerful customization options, carries a significant risk due to the lack of reviews and potential for bugs. It might be suitable only for merchants with very specific payment customization needs and the technical expertise or willingness to troubleshoot issues. A merchant should only consider MIT Payment Hider after extremely thorough testing or if very specific payment hiding requirements exist that Redeemly or other apps cannot fulfill. For most stores, Redeemly is the clear winner.
Redeemly Store Credit Cashback is likely easier to set up and use due to its focus on a single, relatively simple function: providing store credit. MIT Payment Hider, with its customizable rules for hiding and renaming payment methods, likely requires more configuration and potentially more technical knowledge.
MIT Payment Hider *could* be better for international stores if merchants need to hide payment methods based on the customer's country or Shopify Market. However, its lack of reviews makes it a risky choice. A merchant would need to verify it works flawlessly with various international payment gateways.
Redeemly Store Credit Cashback is more directly aimed at improving sales by incentivizing repeat purchases with store credit. MIT Payment Hider might indirectly improve sales by simplifying the checkout process, but this is less direct and more dependent on the specific needs of the store's customers.
It's impossible to determine which app has better customer support based solely on the provided information. The debug option in MIT Payment Hider suggests they are prepared to fix issues, but the lack of user reviews makes it hard to assess the effectiveness of their support.
Redeemly Store Credit Cashback is significantly less risky to install due to its high rating and positive reviews. MIT Payment Hider's lack of reviews and potential for bugs make it a riskier choice.
Run audits for SEO, CRO, PageSpeed, and AI visibility. Get a clear report and actionable fixes.
Try Fix My Store